Put your web address into this and be in for a surprise.....

[Lafeenoire]

http://validator.w3.org/

A friend of mine recently showed me how her website had 0 coding errors as far as the HTML coding was concerned . Now granted all these tests read sites differently and basically it makes little difference to the visitor or administrator of ekm interface. However if we want to be #1 page 1 of google and therefore as slick as we can be then how come my site having been re done at great expense only a few months ago registered in this test as having over 900 errors. Not impressed also that sitereportcard picke up NO keywords and NO content...thank goodness Google pick me up tho eh! Well at best I can get onto page one but I will never be credited with having a perfectly written site! The answer I got when queried this (after several arguments) was 'its just like spelling mistakes and no big deal...well Sitereportcard pulled up 3 spelling errors which I immedialty fixed and was cross with myself for those. So if EKM are happy to be responsible for 900 errors in my coding then thats a shame...I mean thsi is only in the home page!!The landing page for all the spybots etc so what chance have I got of getting where I want to be? er NONE!Grrrrrr